Welcome
ArcanumArcanorum a[2]
Old name, new group. A place for multi-disciplinary examination of life as we know it... or don't.

Tick Tock Time Talk (4 threads, 121 posts)
    The Nature of Time (29 posts)
    Social Thread

    A con/per-ceptual discussion. ...
    15 Members have made 29 Posts here to date.
    Google
    AncientWorlds.net Web
    Next: Huh?
    Prev: Lunch time, doubly so...
    Open or closed?
    avatar121002.jpg
    Author: * Yuya Amenhotep - 3 Posts on this thread out of 54 Posts sitewide.
    Date: Dec 16, 2002 - 16:26

    Here are some links that sum things up:

    http://archive.ncsa.uiuc.edu/Cyberia/Cosmos/InTheBeginning.html

    http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni/uni_101bb2.html

    As the Nasa site linked to above says: That region of space that is within our present horizon was indeed no bigger than a point in the past. Nevertheless, if all of space both inside and outside our horizon is infinite now, it was born infinite. If it is closed and finite, then it was born with zero volume and grew from that.

    My point in the earlier post that (as stated) assumed that the universe was 'closed' was that even this theory implies an eternal/infinite universe that existed "before" this one came into being.

    If there "was" an infinite universe, then by neccesity there must still "be" an infinite universe permeating the one we live in.

    Does it matter if space is 'open' or 'closed' if time is uni-directional, or do you have reason to believe that time is multi-directional?

    Yuya was Here



    NEXT: Huh?
    PREV: Lunch time, doubly so...
Rome - Rome, Season 1 - The Stolen Eagle


Copyright 2002-2008 AncientWorlds LLC | Code of Conduct and Terms of Service | Contact Us! | The AncientWorlds Staff