Welcome
The Academy
History with a martial flair.

Strategy (1 threads, 56 posts)
    Rome's Grand Strategem: Frontier Expansion and Border Defense (26 posts)
    Historical Thread

    Did Rome actually pursue a concerted strategy -- other than "conquer and rule"? ...
    5 Members have made 24 Posts here to date.
    Google
    AncientWorlds.net Web
    Next: Thin veneer
    Prev: Ernst Badian's Roman Imperialism
    Question of a "deliberate plan"
    germania1_pnr.gif
    Author: * Arminius Cherusci - 7 Posts on this thread out of 9 Posts sitewide.
    Date: Nov 24, 2003 - 13:11

    Octavian states that there was a deliberate plan for an extended policy of imperialism. "Imperialism," as defined as concerted national policy of conquest of outside cultures for the purpose of extending political and economic control in efforts to dominate the resource base of a given territory, would indicate an offensive action taken on the part of the Roman Consuls.
    This is not the case. The majority of battle that take place after the annihilation of Carthage in 146 BCE are defensive in nature. Even the attack on Carthage was in response to the battles for Sicily, Corsica and Sardinia in 241 BCE and Hannibal's expedition through Spain ending with his defeat in 201 BCE.
    Beyond that the attacks by the Allobroges and Arverni, the Cimbri, Teutones and Ambrones, the Volcae Tectosages even into Caesar against the Sueves, the attacks were offensive strikes in a defensive campaign.
    "Imperialism" was simply a byproduct of the Roman Empire's positioning. Their territory was directly impeding the migratory paths of the outlying tribes. This is the reason for Rome's perpetual need for defense.


    NEXT: Thin veneer
    PREV: Ernst Badian's Roman Imperialism
Rome - Rome, Season 1 - The Stolen Eagle


Copyright 2002-2008 AncientWorlds LLC | Code of Conduct and Terms of Service | Contact Us! | The AncientWorlds Staff