Don't get me started on WWII! The Germans DID roll right on through France even though there was some British aid. Probably because the Blitzkrieg and taking on counties one by one.

Because there was origionally no two front war, Germany was in a total lead. But Hitler attacks Russia. Thats, well not exactlt so many fronts but lets review:
What shall we consider a front? Lets call the African Campaign a front(which was and would have succeeded, but Hitler was throwing everything at Russia)The Russian campaign a front, the "British front", a resistance "front", and moping up Italy's mess.

Wow thats a lot for Germany to be doing. Anyway, they should have won WWI or at lease not have the French be farceurs towards Germany.

I digress again. The point is Germany wins 1v1 versus any county. But Goerin I believe was in charge of the Luftwaffe just stupidly sits there non-sence Battle of Britain.

What Hitler should have done is commit a massive invasion of Britain (similar to D-day against the Germans on June 6) and give Britain the full force of the Teutonic might.

There's another thing. I hate when people are like Britain is so stong, it hasn't been conquered since it has become a county or something as such. Anyway, the point being, Britain sit on an island away from people. They are kind of like the French on an accelerated level. Already retreating:P. And in more recent times, Britain, and the whole of the Allies, recieve aid from America. But do they pay it back? No. If the money were a gift, then I would still have a problem with it but it was loaned out to the Allies. Which means we are right to want it back and they are to pay it. But now-a-days, that money we loaned they is worth squat. Point being, America should side with Germans and let the weak be crushed! I'd love to have a debat if anyone opposes Germany Domination! If they want it, let them go for it! If they want to conqueror France, let them, the French will just cowar away. Don't even help the weak!

Ok, where shall we begin? How about more modern history of the Germans.

World War I. The Great war. I believe the U.S. should have supported the Germans! Why some might ask? Because the Germans and Austro-Hungarians were correct. Serbia wanted Bosnia. Austro-Hungarians took Bosnia. Serbia supports methods to get Bosnia back and suddenly we have an Archduke dead. Anyway, Russia should not have got in the way. It was dispute between two countries. I don't know about the lot of you, but I come from the South and things get settled man to man.

I digress, the point being Russia goes to help Serbia, then German tells Russia to stop mobilizing their troops. The refuse. France mobilizes. Germany mobilizes. WORLD WAR I. According to the Schlieffen Plan, Germany strikes-first. (where have we seen this? Lightning War Blitzkreig) Anyway, Germany is to strike France first in order to prevent a two front war. They find the easiest way to France is through Belgium. So they go through Belgium and into France. Belgium being a neutral country, brought Britain into the conflict. So the Germans get withing about 30 miles of Paris and it takes the British and French combined efforts along with some troops sitting on the eastern front to prevent Germany from whiping out France. So Germany gets a little scared when some poorly equiped Russians invade in the east and they send troops to the eastern front. Perhaps if they didn't they could have taken the French. Anyway so Germany is fighting a two front war, their army is divided, and sill they have the will to continue fighting. Eventually, through propaganda, the British were able to turn the Americans against the Germans. And then it finally took all four major powers to take Germany down!

My point being it takes so many strong countries to take out Germany. And one on one Germany would have killed any country.

Also the U.S. should have joined sides with the Central Powers. The Lucitania was sunk because it was carring arms to Britain. The Germans sunk it because they said it had arms on it. American denied it. Recently, we have gone to the bottom of the ship wreck and guess what we found? ARMS. So thus concluded, was Germany wrong to sink a ship carrying supplies to an enemy? No. Truely no. There may have been civilians on the ship, but the Americans were just trying to hide behind that.